Codec Landscape

Quality vs Bit-rate

The figure below illustrates the quality of various codecs as a function of the bit-rate. It attempts to summarize results from a collection of listening tests and (when no data exists) show anecdotal evidence. It is overall fairly representative, but attempting to extract any exact value at a particular bitrate is certainly not recommended (SVG version).
Illustration of the quality of different codecs

Bitrate/Latency Comparison

Illustration showing overlapping circles against delay/quality to suggest applications where Opus is useful.

Listening Tests

Several tests were conducted on Opus, but only the ones conducted on the final bit-stream are listed below. Although these should give a good idea of the quality of Opus at the time of its standardization (and 1.0 release), we are hoping that newer and more advanced encoders will reach even better quality.

HydrogenAudio

These are the results of MUSHRA tests comparing Opus with Vorbis and HE-AAC on 48 kHz stereo music at 64 kb/s. For the full details, see the official results page and Greg Maxwell's analysis/listening page.

Bar chart showing Opus outperforming two AAC-HE encoders and libvorbis.

Google listening tests

Jan Skoglund from Google organized two sets of listening tests. The first set of listening tests includes a narrowband speech test, a wideband-fullband speech test, and a stereo music test.

The second set of listening tests measures the narrowband and wideband/fullband speech quality on Mandarin and the transcoding quality in narrowband and wideband.

Nokia listening test

Anssi Ramo and Henri Toukomaa from Nokia measured the Opus speech quality at various rates and published their results in this conference paper:

In this paper, the Opus "hybrid" and "MDCT" curves measure the constant bit-rate (CBR) quality, which is not as good as the quality Opus achieves with variable bit-rate (VBR).